Skip to main content

New Drug Approvals 2012 - Pt. V - Ivacaftor (KalydecoTM)





 
  ATC code R07AX02 
Wikipedia Ivacaftor

On January 31st, FDA approved Ivacaftor (previously known as VX-770, trade name Kalydeco) as a first-in-class oral drug for the treatment of a rare form of Cystic Fibrosis in patients aged 6 or older, caused by a G551D mutation of the CFTR gene.

Cystic Fibrosis (OMIM 219700) is an autosomal recessive genetic disease caused by a mutation in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, resulting in a defective CFTR protein, an ABC-class chloride-ion transporter in epithelial cell membranes. Cystic Fibrosis (CF) most typically affects the lungs, leading to the secretion of thick mucus, consequent breathing difficulties and eventual secondary bacterial airway infections in an age-dependent manner, i.e. early infections with Staphylococcus aureus which eventually are replaced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa as disease progresses. Traditionally, management of the symptoms involves mechanical removal of mucus, assisted breathing by ventilators, and antibiotic treatment of the secondary infections.

Ivacaftor is the first drug directly targeting CFTR rather than CF symptoms alone. It is estimated that about 1 in 20 to 1 in 25 people unsymtomatically carry one allele of the defective gene, with about 1 in 2000 to 1 in 3000 newborns being homozygous for defective CFTR. Numerous mutations may cause disfunctional products of the CFTR gene. More than two thirds of cases are caused by ΔF508, the deletion of Phenylalanine at position 508 of the CFTR protein (UniProt P13569), leading to failure of targeting the protein to the plasma membrane. The G551D mutation Ivacaftor is approved for less than 5% of CF cases (about 1,200 patients in the United States). With this mutation, the protein is transported to the plasma membrane correctly, but ion transport is impaired. Ivacaftor improves ion transport, and is therefore a CFTR potentiator. Currently, Vertex are developing a further compound, VX-809  targeting the ΔF508 mutation (currently in phase 2), and Ataluren, targeting nonsense mutations, is in phase 3 clinical trials.
Ivacaftor (C24H28N2O3, PubChem 16220172) is a synthetic small molecule achiral drug with a molecular weight of 392.49 Da. It has 4 rotatable bonds, a calculated logP (alogP) of 4.516, 3 hydrogen bond acceptors and 3 hydrogen bond donors and is thus fully Ro5 compliant. IUPAC name: N-(2,4-ditert-butyl-5-hydroxyphenyl)-4-oxo-1H-quinoline-3-carboxamide InChi: InChI=1S/C24H28N2O3/c1-23(2,3)16-11-17(24(4, 5)6)20(27)12-19(16)26-22(29)15-13-25-18-10-8-7-9-14(18)21(15)28/h7-13, 27H,1-6H3,(H,25,28)(H,26,29) Canonical Smiles: CC(C)(C)C1=CC(=C(C=C1NC(=O)C2=CNC3=CC=CC=C3C2=O)O)C(C)(C)C Ivacaftor is dosed as 150 mg tablet twice daily (an equivalent of about 0.38 mM of active incredient per single dose), or less often in patients with renal impairment or patients taking CYP3A inhibitors (see below).

Peak plasma concentrations (Tmax) occur at about 4 hours post administration with a Cmax of 768 ng/mL and mean apparent volume of distribution of 353 L. The main route of clearance of Ivacaftor is fecal with an apparent terminal half-life (t1/2) of 12 hours for a single dose. Ivacaftor is known to interact with drugs that inhibit CYP3A, such as ketoconazole and fluconazole, both antifungal agents, and grapefruit juice, or drugs inducing CYP3A, such as the bactericidal antibiotic rifampin. Ivacaftor has not been tested in pregnant or nursing populations, infants younger than 6 years, or geriatric populations (CF being a disease mostly affecting young adults).

Ivacaftor has been developed by Vertex Pharmaceuticals (which it is also marketed by), and the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation.

The product website can be found here, and the full prescribing information, here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New SureChEMBL announcement

(Generated with DALL-E 3 ∙ 30 October 2023 at 1:48 pm) We have some very exciting news to report: the new SureChEMBL is now available! Hooray! What is SureChEMBL, you may ask. Good question! In our portfolio of chemical biology services, alongside our established database of bioactivity data for drug-like molecules ChEMBL , our dictionary of annotated small molecule entities ChEBI , and our compound cross-referencing system UniChem , we also deliver a database of annotated patents! Almost 10 years ago , EMBL-EBI acquired the SureChem system of chemically annotated patents and made this freely accessible in the public domain as SureChEMBL. Since then, our team has continued to maintain and deliver SureChEMBL. However, this has become increasingly challenging due to the complexities of the underlying codebase. We were awarded a Wellcome Trust grant in 2021 to completely overhaul SureChEMBL, with a new UI, backend infrastructure, and new f

A python client for accessing ChEMBL web services

Motivation The CheMBL Web Services provide simple reliable programmatic access to the data stored in ChEMBL database. RESTful API approaches are quite easy to master in most languages but still require writing a few lines of code. Additionally, it can be a challenging task to write a nontrivial application using REST without any examples. These factors were the motivation for us to write a small client library for accessing web services from Python. Why Python? We choose this language because Python has become extremely popular (and still growing in use) in scientific applications; there are several Open Source chemical toolkits available in this language, and so the wealth of ChEMBL resources and functionality of those toolkits can be easily combined. Moreover, Python is a very web-friendly language and we wanted to show how easy complex resource acquisition can be expressed in Python. Reinventing the wheel? There are already some libraries providing access to ChEMBL d

LSH-based similarity search in MongoDB is faster than postgres cartridge.

TL;DR: In his excellent blog post , Matt Swain described the implementation of compound similarity searches in MongoDB . Unfortunately, Matt's approach had suboptimal ( polynomial ) time complexity with respect to decreasing similarity thresholds, which renders unsuitable for production environments. In this article, we improve on the method by enhancing it with Locality Sensitive Hashing algorithm, which significantly reduces query time and outperforms RDKit PostgreSQL cartridge . myChEMBL 21 - NoSQL edition    Given that NoSQL technologies applied to computational chemistry and cheminformatics are gaining traction and popularity, we decided to include a taster in future myChEMBL releases. Two especially appealing technologies are Neo4j and MongoDB . The former is a graph database and the latter is a BSON document storage. We would like to provide IPython notebook -based tutorials explaining how to use this software to deal with common cheminformatics p

Multi-task neural network on ChEMBL with PyTorch 1.0 and RDKit

  Update: KNIME protocol with the model available thanks to Greg Landrum. Update: New code to train the model and ONNX exported trained models available in github . The use and application of multi-task neural networks is growing rapidly in cheminformatics and drug discovery. Examples can be found in the following publications: - Deep Learning as an Opportunity in VirtualScreening - Massively Multitask Networks for Drug Discovery - Beyond the hype: deep neural networks outperform established methods using a ChEMBL bioactivity benchmark set But what is a multi-task neural network? In short, it's a kind of neural network architecture that can optimise multiple classification/regression problems at the same time while taking advantage of their shared description. This blogpost gives a great overview of their architecture. All networks in references above implement the hard parameter sharing approach. So, having a set of activities relating targets and molecules we can tra

Using ChEMBL activity comments

We’re sometimes asked what the ‘activity_comments’ in the ChEMBL database mean. In this Blog post, we’ll use aspirin as an example to explain some of the more common activity comments. First, let’s review the bioactivity data included in ChEMBL. We extract bioactivity data directly from   seven core medicinal chemistry journals . Some common activity types, such as IC50s, are standardised  to allow broad comparisons across assays; the standardised data can be found in the  standard_value ,  standard_relation  and  standard_units  fields. Original data is retained in the database downloads in the  value ,  relation  and  units  fields. However, we extract all data from a publication including non-numerical bioactivity and ADME data. In these cases, the activity comments may be populated during the ChEMBL extraction-curation process  in order to capture the author's  overall  conclusions . Similarly, for deposited datasets and subsets of other databases (e.g. DrugMatrix, PubChem), th